<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Judge Upholds Casino Caucus Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/</link>
	<description>Follow FOX News' Major Garret as he reports on the 2008 presidential candidates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:43:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>Right. US election looks like a &lt;a&gt;gambling&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. US election looks like a <a>gambling</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Watkins</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>Some people make the common mistake of linking Culinary 226 with Nevada casinos. As a 40 year resident of LV, I can tell you emphatically that the union has absolutely nothing to do with any part of casino operations, employees or executives. The sign out front says Hotel/Casino and each part of the operation is under it&#039;s own umbrella, i.e. insurance, management hiring procedures, etc. The culinary union represents such personnel as house-keepers, porters, bartenders and bell staff. It does not represent front desk, parking attendants, casino dealers, slot personnel or casino executives. Such people should refrain from making comments that refer the Culinary union as a part of casino employees.  Thomas, Las Vegas Ret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people make the common mistake of linking Culinary 226 with Nevada casinos. As a 40 year resident of LV, I can tell you emphatically that the union has absolutely nothing to do with any part of casino operations, employees or executives. The sign out front says Hotel/Casino and each part of the operation is under it&#8217;s own umbrella, i.e. insurance, management hiring procedures, etc. The culinary union represents such personnel as house-keepers, porters, bartenders and bell staff. It does not represent front desk, parking attendants, casino dealers, slot personnel or casino executives. Such people should refrain from making comments that refer the Culinary union as a part of casino employees.  Thomas, Las Vegas Ret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>I am thrilled with this decision;  and believe the timing of the lawsuit was no coincidence, given Barack Obama&#039;s endorsement just days prior.  

I don&#039;t care how many times Bill Clinton says they had nothing to do with it....I have a hard time believing it, given past events during his term.  It comes to mind certain comments he made during the Monica Lewinsky scandal that ended up not being true...remember how much of the county&#039;s time and money was spent on THAT?!?   

I am a Democrat, but if Hillary is the nominee -- she will not get my vote.   I do not want another Clinton as President...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thrilled with this decision;  and believe the timing of the lawsuit was no coincidence, given Barack Obama&#8217;s endorsement just days prior.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care how many times Bill Clinton says they had nothing to do with it&#8230;.I have a hard time believing it, given past events during his term.  It comes to mind certain comments he made during the Monica Lewinsky scandal that ended up not being true&#8230;remember how much of the county&#8217;s time and money was spent on THAT?!?   </p>
<p>I am a Democrat, but if Hillary is the nominee &#8212; she will not get my vote.   I do not want another Clinton as President&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad beauchemin</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>brad beauchemin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>This decission is terible. how many people that are voting in the casino where they work with they&#039;re boss&#039;s and union reps. are going to go against the hand that feeds them. it would be different if it was annonymous but this is a caucus and peer and employer presure makes me wonder how honest they could be. they might as well have it at the union hall so if they vote for hillary they can pick up theyre pink slips right there.
                                                       Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This decission is terible. how many people that are voting in the casino where they work with they&#8217;re boss&#8217;s and union reps. are going to go against the hand that feeds them. it would be different if it was annonymous but this is a caucus and peer and employer presure makes me wonder how honest they could be. they might as well have it at the union hall so if they vote for hillary they can pick up theyre pink slips right there.<br />
                                                       Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FeatherLight</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>FeatherLight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>All this back and forthing needs to be eliminated and we NEED to go to one person one vote, at established and permanent locations, in all things having to do with ALL elections. oh wait. We have that. they&#039;re called precincts. 

To have any one vote  exerting greater weight than another, or being more convenient to cast for one citizen than for another, is patently unconstitutional.  Is that not obvious?

This is rather like a reversal of &quot;move to the back of the bus&quot;. Moreover, it gives one huge group of voters a probability of solidarity that carries weight, weight which might be someway influenced to be cast in alignment with the wishes of a powerful group, the casino corporations themselves, all of whom have a vested interest in ANY election that may impact their business.

 I know, I know, you are gasping at the audacity of such a suggestion. Sad to say, my fellow Americans, this undue influence sometimes actually DOES occur in this Great Society....hard to believe, I know....
I have generally voted democratic, but I&#039;m feeling a little antsy about some DemParty decisions in a few areas of late, including in my own state of NC.  Like this one, some of those decisions are a little odorous, having the appearance of being something the Republicans have become well known for...tampering with the vote....

Shame on the DNC. Just because the Repubs manipulated themselves into office once or twice is NO REASON to adopt their un-American tactics. Two wrongs don&#039;t make a right. And besides, the people are (thank you Jesus!) going to elect a Democrat this time to undo some of the damage of the last 8 years of agony, so relax.

As for Obama, well, have you noticed how shaky his voice is sometimes? Like, he&#039;s gotten in over his head and inside is thinking, &quot;Oh, sh*t, NOW what do I say?&quot;
Let&#039;s all just admit what is the truth: Obama is out on a &quot;trial run&quot; this election, a &quot;test drive&quot; if you will. He will not and should not  win  because--simply put--he is not informed enough nor experienced enough as a one term senator. 
He&#039;s a Newbie. BUT, this is great exposure for the NEXT time around...
He sounds good, he has a great rhetoric, he has studied Dr. King well, and he is photogenic. But he is not Presidential material....yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this back and forthing needs to be eliminated and we NEED to go to one person one vote, at established and permanent locations, in all things having to do with ALL elections. oh wait. We have that. they&#8217;re called precincts. </p>
<p>To have any one vote  exerting greater weight than another, or being more convenient to cast for one citizen than for another, is patently unconstitutional.  Is that not obvious?</p>
<p>This is rather like a reversal of &#8220;move to the back of the bus&#8221;. Moreover, it gives one huge group of voters a probability of solidarity that carries weight, weight which might be someway influenced to be cast in alignment with the wishes of a powerful group, the casino corporations themselves, all of whom have a vested interest in ANY election that may impact their business.</p>
<p> I know, I know, you are gasping at the audacity of such a suggestion. Sad to say, my fellow Americans, this undue influence sometimes actually DOES occur in this Great Society&#8230;.hard to believe, I know&#8230;.<br />
I have generally voted democratic, but I&#8217;m feeling a little antsy about some DemParty decisions in a few areas of late, including in my own state of NC.  Like this one, some of those decisions are a little odorous, having the appearance of being something the Republicans have become well known for&#8230;tampering with the vote&#8230;.</p>
<p>Shame on the DNC. Just because the Repubs manipulated themselves into office once or twice is NO REASON to adopt their un-American tactics. Two wrongs don&#8217;t make a right. And besides, the people are (thank you Jesus!) going to elect a Democrat this time to undo some of the damage of the last 8 years of agony, so relax.</p>
<p>As for Obama, well, have you noticed how shaky his voice is sometimes? Like, he&#8217;s gotten in over his head and inside is thinking, &#8220;Oh, sh*t, NOW what do I say?&#8221;<br />
Let&#8217;s all just admit what is the truth: Obama is out on a &#8220;trial run&#8221; this election, a &#8220;test drive&#8221; if you will. He will not and should not  win  because&#8211;simply put&#8211;he is not informed enough nor experienced enough as a one term senator.<br />
He&#8217;s a Newbie. BUT, this is great exposure for the NEXT time around&#8230;<br />
He sounds good, he has a great rhetoric, he has studied Dr. King well, and he is photogenic. But he is not Presidential material&#8230;.yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: View from Ascraeus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Good Political Stories</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>View from Ascraeus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Good Political Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>[...] unassociated with the Clinton campaign lawsuit to stop the Caucuses at Large on the Vegas Strip  has been dismissed*. Given that she has apparently pledged to lay off the racial smears, I presume this means means [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unassociated with the Clinton campaign lawsuit to stop the Caucuses at Large on the Vegas Strip  has been dismissed*. Given that she has apparently pledged to lay off the racial smears, I presume this means means [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Judge OKs Nevada At-Large Caucus Sites You Decide 08!</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Judge OKs Nevada At-Large Caucus Sites You Decide 08!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more in Major Garrett&#8217;s Bourbon Room. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more in Major Garrett&#8217;s Bourbon Room. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labor Day for Clinton v Obama &#171; FOX Embeds &#171; FOXNews.com</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Labor Day for Clinton v Obama &#171; FOX Embeds &#171; FOXNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>[...] and Barack Obama in Nevada today. First, it was the state teachers&#8217; union &#8212; which, as Major Garrett reports, lost a lawsuit that would have overturned a law allowing casino workers to caucus at designated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Barack Obama in Nevada today. First, it was the state teachers&#8217; union &#8212; which, as Major Garrett reports, lost a lawsuit that would have overturned a law allowing casino workers to caucus at designated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re:Generator Magazine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Temper tantrums don&#8217;t always work</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Re:Generator Magazine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Temper tantrums don&#8217;t always work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>[...] Clintons don&#8217;t get their way in Nevada.   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clintons don&#8217;t get their way in Nevada.   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen2</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/17/federal-judge-upholds-casino-caucus-sites/#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>If the Teachers Union is so concerned about the janitors being able to participate in their local caucus, then the teachers or caucus attendees can clean up after themselves.   Oh, please - weak argument.

Oh, and do Bill and Hill need a tissue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Teachers Union is so concerned about the janitors being able to participate in their local caucus, then the teachers or caucus attendees can clean up after themselves.   Oh, please &#8211; weak argument.</p>
<p>Oh, and do Bill and Hill need a tissue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
