Comments on: South Carolina Debate http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/ Follow FOX News' Major Garret as he reports on the 2008 presidential candidates. Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:43:03 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Sherry http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1643 Sherry Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:27:06 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1643 Hillary won by a land slide! Obama thought he was in church once again with his preacher spew. Again, no laid out plans, no explaining what the big "change" is going to be. It was just all fumbles and stumbles again and again and again...I want to hear some substance!! Hillary won by a land slide! Obama thought he was in church once again with his preacher spew. Again, no laid out plans, no explaining what the big “change” is going to be. It was just all fumbles and stumbles again and again and again…I want to hear some substance!!

]]> By: Carl http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1625 Carl Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:02:59 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1625 Hillary was doing well until the "cackle". Seriously, I have a couple obvious, objective points to make: 1. Wolf Blitzer actually behaved himself and asked a couple questions that were actually probing in nature, and elicited meaningful response and banter. 2. There is no question in my mind that some of the questions ( woman on the end, with a prompter to her right) were staged for Hillary, given her completely rehearsed orchestral punchlines at the end of her response. Do not underestimate the power of the Clinton war machine. 3. The favoratism for Hillary was clear, and the difference in audience support and response was palpable. 4. Finally, where were real Americans, the middle class, in that audience? Stevie Wonder? Steven Spielberg? Rob Reiner?... Oh, one last item... why didn't Wolf ask Hillary about the other aspect of socialized medicine? The one so aptly reported by John Stossel some weeks ago... the one where her "plan" is described as certain to restrict personal choice in health care. You want someone telling you where to see which doctor and whether it's appropriate? If I had to live with that, my wife would be blind today , but I had the option to take her 5 hours away to Philly. Think about it, a shoe that fits everyone is going to hurt an awful lot of people. Hillary was doing well until the “cackle”.

Seriously, I have a couple obvious, objective points to make:

1. Wolf Blitzer actually behaved himself and asked a couple questions that were actually probing in nature, and elicited meaningful response and banter.
2. There is no question in my mind that some of the questions ( woman on the end, with a prompter to her right) were staged for Hillary, given her completely rehearsed orchestral punchlines at the end of her response. Do not underestimate the power of the Clinton war machine.
3. The favoratism for Hillary was clear, and the difference in audience support and response was palpable.
4. Finally, where were real Americans, the middle class, in that audience? Stevie Wonder? Steven Spielberg? Rob Reiner?…

Oh, one last item… why didn’t Wolf ask Hillary about the other aspect of socialized medicine? The one so aptly reported by John Stossel some weeks ago… the one where her “plan” is described as certain to restrict personal choice in health care. You want someone telling you where to see which doctor and whether it’s appropriate? If I had to live with that, my wife would be blind today , but I had the option to take her 5 hours away to Philly. Think about it, a shoe that fits everyone is going to hurt an awful lot of people.

]]> By: Mark http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1542 Mark Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:37:01 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1542 Obama definitely won - no contest. Look at this.....after 4 years in the White House the Bush’s hand the keys to the Clinton’s, who after 8 years, hand the keys back to the Bush’s for 8 more years. Now the Clinton’s expect the Bush’s to hand the keys to them for still another 8 years. That means if Hillary wins we will have been governed by the same two families for 28 straight years! We can do better. Obama definitely won – no contest. Look at this…..after 4 years in the White House the Bush’s hand the keys to the Clinton’s, who after 8 years, hand the keys back to the Bush’s for 8 more years. Now the Clinton’s expect the Bush’s to hand the keys to them for still another 8 years. That means if Hillary wins we will have been governed by the same two families for 28 straight years! We can do better.

]]> By: Casey http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1532 Casey Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:47:33 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1532 Barack Obama may have won Iowa (my place of birth) and South Carolina, though he partially lost my original support and vote when he went on the Oprah Show (his wife demonstrated on that first show the "thin line she walks as a reverse racist" and since in a public speech). He, also, had my vote until he permitted Momma Oprah to racially insert herself in his politics and, although she doesn't need the support of most caucasians since she is now a flaunting billionaire, I will never support the Oprah Brand in the future as she has shown her true colors in 2008 (with never having supported a political figure in the past). Barack Obama may have won Iowa (my place of birth) and South Carolina, though he partially lost my original support and vote when he went on the Oprah Show (his wife demonstrated on that first show the “thin line she walks as a reverse racist” and since in a public speech). He, also, had my vote until he permitted Momma Oprah to racially insert herself in his politics and, although she doesn’t need the support of most caucasians since she is now a flaunting billionaire, I will never support the Oprah Brand in the future as she has shown her true colors in 2008 (with never having supported a political figure in the past).

]]> By: Scott http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1527 Scott Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:29:22 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1527 I would like to comment, following a discussion yesterday on the brainwashing of America on the illegal immigration problem. McCain & others seem to have lead people to believe that if Mitt Romney is elected & becomes the first person to actually enforce the laws & not reward illegals with visa's, greencards & citizenship, then there will be many service jobs that they are doing, that Americans simply will not do. This type of logic simply is not true for many reasons. Just one of these is that Americans do not understand the LEGAL immigration process. Americans are NOT against people coming here, but they want it done legally so we know who is here. I can tell you that there is a very very long line of people waiting patiently to come here LEGALLY and when there is a person like Romney in the White House, who makes it clear to the world that if you want to come here, after background checks, interviews, going through the legal process, you're likely to be welcomed. For every person who came here illegally who is deported, there is a replacement in line who will want to come here legally to do exactly the same job. It is both the illegal problem & the legal process which Romney will fix, but he will not reward criminals who have come here illegaly. McCains plan is totally flawed & will make the problem even bigger than it is now. Last point, it is not just Mexicans. There is no malice towards Mexicans who work hard and are good people. Romney's no reward policy is directed towards ANYONE who is here illegally, no matter what country they arrived from. There is a big group of non latino's who have also broken the law & jumped the legal line. I hope people want to solve the problem Washington refuses to and vote for Mitt Romney who is the only candidate who will fix it. I would like to comment, following a discussion yesterday on the brainwashing of America on the illegal immigration problem. McCain & others seem to have lead people to believe that if Mitt Romney is elected & becomes the first person to actually enforce the laws & not reward illegals with visa’s, greencards & citizenship, then there will be many service jobs that they are doing, that Americans simply will not do. This type of logic simply is not true for many reasons. Just one of these is that Americans do not understand the LEGAL immigration process. Americans are NOT against people coming here, but they want it done legally so we know who is here. I can tell you that there is a very very long line of people waiting patiently to come here LEGALLY and when there is a person like Romney in the White House, who makes it clear to the world that if you want to come here, after background checks, interviews, going through the legal process, you’re likely to be welcomed. For every person who came here illegally who is deported, there is a replacement in line who will want to come here legally to do exactly the same job. It is both the illegal problem & the legal process which Romney will fix, but he will not reward criminals who have come here illegaly. McCains plan is totally flawed & will make the problem even bigger than it is now.
Last point, it is not just Mexicans. There is no malice towards Mexicans who work hard and are good people. Romney’s no reward policy is directed towards ANYONE who is here illegally, no matter what country they arrived from. There is a big group of non latino’s who have also broken the law & jumped the legal line.
I hope people want to solve the problem Washington refuses to and vote for Mitt Romney who is the only candidate who will fix it.

]]> By: felimon a. soria http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1506 felimon a. soria Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:31:47 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1506 I disagree with you that Sen. Obama won the debate last Monday. Sen. Clinton did not have any choice but to fight back. Why is it that when Sen. Clinton respond in kind, she is the bully. Sen. Obama I think is the one who is not telling the truth. I disagree with you that Sen. Obama won the debate last Monday. Sen. Clinton did not have any choice but to fight back. Why is it that when Sen. Clinton respond in kind, she is the bully. Sen. Obama I think is the one who is not telling the truth.

]]> By: John S. http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1499 John S. Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:01:44 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1499 This is pretty hot.......... http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/hillary_and_bill_use_alinksy_t.html Obama should be interested in this. This is pretty hot……….

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/hillary_and_bill_use_alinksy_t.html

Obama should be interested in this.

]]> By: Haley http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1494 Haley Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:49:19 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1494 Presidential Voters Guide, Check out the Facts for yourself... http://www.afa.net/pdfs/08vg.pdf Presidential Voters Guide, Check out the Facts for yourself…
http://www.afa.net/pdfs/08vg.pdf

]]> By: jwilbanks6 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1488 jwilbanks6 Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:05:09 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1488 YOU KNOW, SEN. OBAMA WANT FIGHT BACK, IN OTHER WORDS WILL NOT MAKE A STAND EVEN WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO DEFINDING HIMSELF. DO YOU THINK THAT ITS MABY BECAUSE HE HAS A HISTORY OF NOT TAKEING A STAND, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT HIS VOTEING HISTORAY HE DIDENT HAVE MUCH A STSND THERE EATHER. WE NEED A PRESADENT THAT WILL STAND UP AND MAKE A DIFERANCE FOR US THE PEOPLE, ALL THE PEOPLE OF OUR GREAT NATION. THE DEBATE HELPED ME DECIDE. SEN. CLINTON FOR PRESADENT A PERSON THAT CAN AND WILL MAKE THE DIFERANCE, A PERSON WHO IS FOR A "POSITIVE" CHANGE. YOU KNOW, SEN. OBAMA WANT FIGHT BACK, IN OTHER WORDS WILL NOT MAKE A STAND EVEN WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO DEFINDING HIMSELF. DO YOU THINK THAT ITS MABY BECAUSE HE HAS A HISTORY OF NOT TAKEING A STAND, JUST TAKE A LOOK AT HIS VOTEING HISTORAY HE DIDENT HAVE MUCH A STSND THERE EATHER. WE NEED A PRESADENT THAT WILL STAND UP AND MAKE A DIFERANCE FOR US THE PEOPLE, ALL THE PEOPLE OF OUR GREAT NATION. THE DEBATE HELPED ME DECIDE. SEN. CLINTON FOR PRESADENT A PERSON THAT CAN AND WILL MAKE THE DIFERANCE, A PERSON WHO IS FOR A “POSITIVE” CHANGE.

]]> By: J Bishop http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1482 J Bishop Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:20:05 +0000 http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/22/south-carolina-debate/#comment-1482 It appears Hillary won the debate. It won't be long before I start seeing more bumper stickers like the one I saw recently. Monica Lewenskis X boyfriends wife FOR PRESIDENT. It appears Hillary won the debate. It won’t be long before I start seeing more bumper stickers like the one I saw recently.

Monica Lewenskis X boyfriends wife
FOR PRESIDENT.

]]>