Comments on: Los Angeles Debate

By: bj

bj — Thu, 08 May 2008 21:52:50 +0000

i hopewinwould be good comander & chief for the white house. we need her a lot.i hope she beats obama lose.s we know her we don, know his back ground! she was born here in the united states. when bill and her was in office we were doing better but bush has turned every thing back too hurt all of us , i know hillery could turn it around she,s delt with a lot of defrent things in the white house. i feel that obama would not know what too do/ hillery would i know it for a fact. every one loves her. i pray to god every day for her to win !! i know that obama dont help small towns. he runs small towns down i don.t think it,s right. god bless america an hope gods grace and peace. i hope hillery dose not quit shes a fighter. bjs for president she hillery

By: Tim Uribe

Tim Uribe — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:29:10 +0000

I can’t believe the democrats obviously believe the voters are so stupid that they’ll believe what Obama and Clinton say. Obama knows what Rev. Wright’s political opinions are, he’s been a member of that church for over 20 years. GIVE US ALL A BREAK!! And Hillery, SNIPER FIRE?????? Oh brother…….

By: Randy Holdeman

Randy Holdeman — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:16:52 +0000

This election more than any I sit back and wonder why doesn’t the position of the President of the United States have more requirements than it does. Your job and mine has certain minimum requirements, masters degree, experience in related fields something, but what does it say to this country that the most powerful position in the world can be populated by a US sentator with less than one term and only a state asemblyman before that, or a governor of a small state. It would seem a slick talking “used care salesman” can be a front runner if given the chance by the main two parties. Seems resumes should be in order and not resumes fluffed with “35 years of experience”, experience should be related to the workings of the US government, i.e. US Senator serving under committees dealing with our problems. A resume stating yes/no votes on bills and perhaps a reason why. Seems we need more than just words that sound good, we need proven results and past track records.

By: Bonnie

Bonnie — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:28:25 +0000

I will NOT vote for anyone named Barrack Hussein Obama…this is a no brainer folks! As a military member, I can honestly say, NO ONE will follow him in our military!!!!

By: Carl

Carl — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:32:07 +0000

The debates have done little to expose the strengths or shortcomings of the participants, largely because the press has not delivered on the line of questioning. It should be no-holds-barred, and if that is unacceptable, then the candidates have the option of not coming.

Why, for example, has Hillary been given a free pass on Bill’s illicit dealings, many of which she was either complicit or implicated in: Whitewater, Vince Foster and Filegate, Travelgate, Susan McDougal and Jim McDougal, Sandy Berger and stolen documents from our National Archives, 28K in stolen White House furnishings, and lying alongside Bill relative to Gennifer, Susan McDougal, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, and others.

The truth matters, and good journalism seeks it out.

By: Sue

Sue — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:45:58 +0000

I’m just wondering when the citizens of America are going to open their eyes…

His name is Barack Hussein Obama … Hmmm…
Sounds familliar, kinda reminds me of our ENEMIES.

Reports have him raised in Jakarta and attending a Radical Muslim School.

This Canadate for President of the United States has been FILMED turning his back on the U.S. Flag. Many Report that he refuses to Pledge Alligiance to the Flag of the United States. This Canadate took his Oath of Office with the Koran.

Don’t get me wrong, He is very charming and intelligent. But I have a problem with putting a person in charge of our future whom when looked at without the “Rose colored glasses”, Looks, smells and quacks like a Muslim.

Remember Americans, Females in the Muslim and Arab civilizations are nothing more then a piece of meat. No rights at all. God forbid your 16 year old daughter is raped by 3 men (strangers) in her own home. She’ll be Executed for a crime against Chastity, the punnishment is Death by Beheading, PUBLICALLY.

I do not subscribe to any One religion, though I do believe in God, The Father of Jesus, Our Savior. I just do not believe that God wants all females to be meat for any mans pleasure. Do we want to go back 2000 years??

Take a GOOD LOOK at the Muslim world over there in IRAN, IRAQ, SAUDI ARABIA, Etc.

Obama may believe in Jesus Christ, but his ideas about how religion should be practiced should be the #1 Question. The Koran teaches about Christ, it’s true. That does NOT make him a Christian, Catholic or Jew. The Koran is strictly a Muslim Bible.

I can NOT & will NOT support any form of Muslim leader for President of the United States.

The Koran teaches that all other faiths and beliefs are against God.

Remember, We Westerners are nothing more then INFEDELLS whom are not worthy to breath the air.

When is the issue of Faith and the desire to destroy the United States going to come into this election?? Is he going to try to destroy us from the inside out??

I watch the news everyday and see the dispicable state this world is in. Do you??

Do you really think Obama can or will make America Better?? I don’t!
I believe he is the End. The End of us all if elected President.

Good luck America… I pray God has Mercy on Our Souls.

By: Justin

Justin — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 01:10:15 +0000

As a British person observing your elections from afar, I have to say anyone interested in politics anywhere in the world must be interested in the American preisdential elections.

America is by far the most influential and powerful nation in the history of humanity and the actions of American voters will have a profound effect not just on the lives of Americans but people across the world. It isn’t unfair to say that American voters are the most powerful people in the world. In Britain, for example, our foreign policy is alligned to that of America and has been since World War Two. With the notable exception of the Vitenam War, America’s foreign policy has always been Britain’s foreign policy.

It is therefore not suprising that every single British newspaper has unofficially endorsed Barack Obama for president. His vision of hope for America would transcend the world should he be elected. He is seen as the antedote to the obscene political philosophy of President Bush.

I also think that the mere involvemnt of Barack Obama in this race has made a lot of people outside America take stock. America has demonstrated that race or gender are non-issues. For this alone, Americans should be proud.

By: Eric

Eric — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:19:24 +0000

Some very interesting items from the poll that was posted this evening.

For the Democrats, the Clinton-Obama race tightened after Obama proved his mettle by winning Iowa and coming close in New Hampshire; he’s since added South Carolina. In numbers very similar to their levels last month, Obama leads by 2-1 among African-Americans (including black women), by 10 points among men and by 12 points among independents. He’s also ahead by 18 points among Democrats who describe themselves as “very” liberal.

But Clinton is maintaining her advantage in other groups; she leads Obama by 15 points among women and 23 points among white women. She has an 11-point lead among mainline Democrats, as opposed to independents; and is plus-11 among moderate and conservative Democrats, as opposed to liberals overall (among whom it’s Obama plus-8).

She also has more committed support; 62 percent of Clinton voters say they strongly support her, compared with 49 percent of Obama’s. Both well outstrip McCain’s 38 percent strong support.
And on strength and direction

Beneath these overall numbers has been a shift back toward Clinton in a key dynamic of the race, the battle between her trademark attributes of strength and experience vs. Obama’s focus on a new direction and new ideas.

In December the two concepts were at parity, with Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents dividing evenly on which was more important. Last month, with Obama gaining ground, Democrats by 54-36 percent gave more importance to a “new direction.” In this poll, the two competing attributes again are back at parity, 46-45 percent.

These matter because these preferences cut so heavily to vote choice. Among people who care more about strength and experience, Clinton leads Obama by 75-17 percent; among those who are more concerned with a new direction and new ideas, it’s Obama by 70-22 percent. These two competing visions strongly define the Democratic race.

Associated with these views, Clinton holds a substantial 58-34 percent advantage over Obama as the “strongest leader,” a gap that’s widened since last month. At the same time, he leads her, albeit by a much narrower 7 points, as the candidate who’s best able “to bring needed change to Washington.” Clinton and Obama were about even on that attribute last month.
On the issues Hillary also holds a lead even among the people that care about the Iraq war.

Within her party, Clinton holds a large and undiminished lead in trust to handle health care, as well as a 52-38 percent advantage over Obama in trust to handle the economy — potentially useful given its growing importance. She has a smaller 8-point edge in trust to handle the Iraq war; the two are closer to even on handling immigration.
Of course things can change but this does look like a more favorable Feb 5th for Hillary than I was expecting.

Poll results are here:
http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Vote2008/Story?id=4233020&page=2

By: Ken

Ken — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:43:01 +0000

The Clinton administratrion did in fact accomplish some good things in the 90’s this is undeniable, but they also did more damage to the Democratic Party than any other person I can think of during my life time, and I’m 47 years old. All of this could have been avoided if Bill Clinton would have simply kept his pants up, or if he was going to drop his pants, don’t lie about it.
At any rate, everyone that remembers what happened has a recalls that Bill Clinton Lied Under Oath, and was proven to be a Pervert of the highest caliber. As a result our party was told we had no morales, or values, and rightly so. The supreme leader of our party wass caught red handed.
Bear in mind when Bill Clinton took office the Democrats had a majority in the House, the Senate, and we had a Democratic President. By the time his antics had run their course we lost control of the House, the Senate, and ultimately the Presidency. Basically he was handed a Golden Goose, and turned it into a delapidated chicken during his tenure. Not what I would call an accomplishment! Not to mention the administration was riddled with scandal, to the point a lot of issues weren’t addressed that should have been.
At any rate the point I’m trying to make is this. If Hillary gets the nomination, it’s doubtfull that she’ll get the Presidency, but for the sake of argument, let’s say she wins. Her administration will begin where the last one left off, right in the middle of a scandal, impeeding any progress at all, and once again we will see what we’ve seen all the long. Gridlock, with no path for compromise. Winston Churchill once said “Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it”. Do we really have to re-live this saga in our country? I would think not.
I don’t vote based on what prophets say, or for that matter because of what the media says, they’re to easy to bait into an issue, and they usually take it hook line and sinker. Rather I vote based on reason. Barak Obama seems to be the only rational choice, all things considered. What we need right now is change without question, but it needs to be change like we’ve never seen before, but know can be attained. I honestly believe he can pull it off. For what it’s worth I have a lot to loose by choosing the wrong canidate. I have a Son in Baghdad at this very moment. OBAMA 08′

By: Bill

Bill — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:56:54 +0000

Comment: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/2/132935/7717/376/436944

Click the link above for a dose of reality Obamacans