<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wes Clark&#8217;s 2004 Democratic Convention Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/</link>
	<description>Follow FOX News' Major Garret as he reports on the 2008 presidential candidates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:43:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eliana</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3986</link>
		<dc:creator>eliana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3986</guid>
		<description>Ladies and gentlemen of the press, thank you for meeting me at this Captain D&#039;s Seafood Kitchen as I elaborate on the comments of my client, Wesley Clark.

First off, Gen. Clark&#039;s comments were taken wildly out of context. Yes, he said, &quot;I don&#039;t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president,&quot; but also unspoken and implied is that Sen. McCain failed to find his way back to friendly territory like you see in the movies all the time. What message are we sending to our hopeful, cinephile youth if we elect this kind of quitter?

See more here: http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/03/the_worlds_worst_pr_guy_spins_6_7512.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies and gentlemen of the press, thank you for meeting me at this Captain D&#8217;s Seafood Kitchen as I elaborate on the comments of my client, Wesley Clark.</p>
<p>First off, Gen. Clark&#8217;s comments were taken wildly out of context. Yes, he said, &#8220;I don&#8217;t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president,&#8221; but also unspoken and implied is that Sen. McCain failed to find his way back to friendly territory like you see in the movies all the time. What message are we sending to our hopeful, cinephile youth if we elect this kind of quitter?</p>
<p>See more here: <a href="http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/03/the_worlds_worst_pr_guy_spins_6_7512.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/03/the_worlds_worst_pr_guy_spins_6_7512.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIChris</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3699</link>
		<dc:creator>RIChris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3699</guid>
		<description>How many people have to end up under that bus before Obama&#039;s followers start to ask themselves if they are next??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many people have to end up under that bus before Obama&#8217;s followers start to ask themselves if they are next??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Masterson</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Masterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>I am one of many that were undecided.......but Wes Clark has made up my mind.......I am definitely voting for John McCain.  Obama has shown his true character, he could have stopped Clark from making such statements about McCain&#039;s War record,.....but I am sure the Obama machine is behind Wes Clark.........Obama did say one thing that is correct......that some people will portray him as a scary character......well, he is doing a pretty good job of that himself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of many that were undecided&#8230;&#8230;.but Wes Clark has made up my mind&#8230;&#8230;.I am definitely voting for John McCain.  Obama has shown his true character, he could have stopped Clark from making such statements about McCain&#8217;s War record,&#8230;..but I am sure the Obama machine is behind Wes Clark&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Obama did say one thing that is correct&#8230;&#8230;that some people will portray him as a scary character&#8230;&#8230;well, he is doing a pretty good job of that himself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>It appears political bias continues to prevent some from seeing the truth. The Swift Boat crews told it like it was and some of you folks don&#039;t like it... Tough. Kerry was mostly in protected or low risk zones. His wounds (minor scratches) were not directly related to combat activities. He knew that with the accumulation of his Purple Hearts, he got a quick trip back home with a platform for a political career. Do you honestly think his father the Senator, and the military heads, would allow this jerk to be endangered. They had it all figured out. A quick tour, superficial scratches as described by the Medics, and demanding Purple Hearts for his ticket back home. Clark, Kerry, Edwards, Clinton, Murtha, Reed, Pelosi.. Gosh, it&#039;s enough to make me puke. Bush has made me spitting mad quite a bit, but he&#039;s better than the alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears political bias continues to prevent some from seeing the truth. The Swift Boat crews told it like it was and some of you folks don&#8217;t like it&#8230; Tough. Kerry was mostly in protected or low risk zones. His wounds (minor scratches) were not directly related to combat activities. He knew that with the accumulation of his Purple Hearts, he got a quick trip back home with a platform for a political career. Do you honestly think his father the Senator, and the military heads, would allow this jerk to be endangered. They had it all figured out. A quick tour, superficial scratches as described by the Medics, and demanding Purple Hearts for his ticket back home. Clark, Kerry, Edwards, Clinton, Murtha, Reed, Pelosi.. Gosh, it&#8217;s enough to make me puke. Bush has made me spitting mad quite a bit, but he&#8217;s better than the alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EyesWideOpen</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3644</link>
		<dc:creator>EyesWideOpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3644</guid>
		<description>Myopia of Convenience is the modus operandi of today&#039;s Demotratic Party.  From that jaundice perspective, it is expedient and fruitful for Obama to bring aboard a former high-ranking officer whose own self-serving political agenda is well-known.

You can pity this myopia as degenerate politics. However, a myopia within the media and citizenry damages the high purpose and mandate that faces this Country. 

There is little or no mention of the direct relationship between the military conscience of Duty, Honor and Country and the Stuff of a President. We pay genuflective lip-service to our veterans, but don&#039;t see that, for some of them, this same thread remains unbroken in charting an even higher personal course to serve our Country. For some, like John McCain, it has been a continuous course of Service.

When you start chipping away at that service, you belittle the very ideals of those who now Serve and someday may have the same aspiration.  Everything is fair game, though, when self-aggrendizement flushes regard for high ideals and dedication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myopia of Convenience is the modus operandi of today&#8217;s Demotratic Party.  From that jaundice perspective, it is expedient and fruitful for Obama to bring aboard a former high-ranking officer whose own self-serving political agenda is well-known.</p>
<p>You can pity this myopia as degenerate politics. However, a myopia within the media and citizenry damages the high purpose and mandate that faces this Country. </p>
<p>There is little or no mention of the direct relationship between the military conscience of Duty, Honor and Country and the Stuff of a President. We pay genuflective lip-service to our veterans, but don&#8217;t see that, for some of them, this same thread remains unbroken in charting an even higher personal course to serve our Country. For some, like John McCain, it has been a continuous course of Service.</p>
<p>When you start chipping away at that service, you belittle the very ideals of those who now Serve and someday may have the same aspiration.  Everything is fair game, though, when self-aggrendizement flushes regard for high ideals and dedication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3595</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3595</guid>
		<description>Dear General Clark,

Your comments, made earlier this week, in regards Mr. McCain&#039;s credentials to be President of the United States are, in fact, correct.  It is true, that being a member of the military, a fighter pilot or even  a tortured prisoner of war, in themselves do not automatically qualify any person to be President.

That said, I would point out that Mr. McCain&#039;s choices, decisions, his conduct and behavior during this period of time in his life, certainly speaks highly of his courage, toughness, loyalty and love of our country.  Certainly sir, I would say that it shouts the fact that Mr. McCain&#039;s character and judgment has been tested hard and proven beyond question!

I don&#039;t know about you General, but when I am choosing who to support, for the most important office in the United States, these personal characteristics are among the most important measures by which I evaluate the man asking for my vote.

I ask you General Clark, if Mr. McCain&#039;s character, tested and proven, does not speak to his qualifications to be President of the United States, what makes you believe that Barrack O&#039;Bama is more so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear General Clark,</p>
<p>Your comments, made earlier this week, in regards Mr. McCain&#8217;s credentials to be President of the United States are, in fact, correct.  It is true, that being a member of the military, a fighter pilot or even  a tortured prisoner of war, in themselves do not automatically qualify any person to be President.</p>
<p>That said, I would point out that Mr. McCain&#8217;s choices, decisions, his conduct and behavior during this period of time in his life, certainly speaks highly of his courage, toughness, loyalty and love of our country.  Certainly sir, I would say that it shouts the fact that Mr. McCain&#8217;s character and judgment has been tested hard and proven beyond question!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you General, but when I am choosing who to support, for the most important office in the United States, these personal characteristics are among the most important measures by which I evaluate the man asking for my vote.</p>
<p>I ask you General Clark, if Mr. McCain&#8217;s character, tested and proven, does not speak to his qualifications to be President of the United States, what makes you believe that Barrack O&#8217;Bama is more so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3578</guid>
		<description>The Republicans would have thrown Mother Theresa under the bus if they thought it to be politically expedient.  What is so wrong with a universally respected military man questioning whether or not Sen. McCain&#039;s experiences as a pilot in the Vietnam War, in and of themselves, qualify him to be Commander and Chief.  I have no problems with McCain believing his military experiences are legitimate qualifications, I just don&#039;t think that he and all of you conservatives should foam at the mouth when someone like Gen Clark, a person who has attained one of the most crucial military commands on the planet, presents another point-of-view on McCain&#039;s leadership credentials.  Republicans... life is tough, wear a cup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republicans would have thrown Mother Theresa under the bus if they thought it to be politically expedient.  What is so wrong with a universally respected military man questioning whether or not Sen. McCain&#8217;s experiences as a pilot in the Vietnam War, in and of themselves, qualify him to be Commander and Chief.  I have no problems with McCain believing his military experiences are legitimate qualifications, I just don&#8217;t think that he and all of you conservatives should foam at the mouth when someone like Gen Clark, a person who has attained one of the most crucial military commands on the planet, presents another point-of-view on McCain&#8217;s leadership credentials.  Republicans&#8230; life is tough, wear a cup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim_CA</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim_CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>oop&#039;s....scared away the moron Liberal troll!  Guess the questions were too tough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oop&#8217;s&#8230;.scared away the moron Liberal troll!  Guess the questions were too tough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Eagle</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3570</link>
		<dc:creator>American Eagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3570</guid>
		<description>You have to just love the Dems. They will run anyone, and I mean anyone, with the belief the person is the best thing since sliced bread. Then, after the November elections, they&#039;ll scratch their heads in disbelief and blame the EVIL right wing conspiracy. All politicians, and political parties conspire; its the nature of the game when trying to win an election. The trick is to seem that you&#039;re not doing it. As for Wesley Clark, comon! Wasn&#039;t this guy dismissed by his Commander-In-Chief Clinton during the 1990s? If this guy rose to the rank of General, I feel sorry for the military. He is a fool when it comes to politics or any understanding of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to just love the Dems. They will run anyone, and I mean anyone, with the belief the person is the best thing since sliced bread. Then, after the November elections, they&#8217;ll scratch their heads in disbelief and blame the EVIL right wing conspiracy. All politicians, and political parties conspire; its the nature of the game when trying to win an election. The trick is to seem that you&#8217;re not doing it. As for Wesley Clark, comon! Wasn&#8217;t this guy dismissed by his Commander-In-Chief Clinton during the 1990s? If this guy rose to the rank of General, I feel sorry for the military. He is a fool when it comes to politics or any understanding of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proud2bHumble</title>
		<link>http://bourbonroom.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/01/wes-clarks-2004-democratic-convention-speech/#comment-3562</link>
		<dc:creator>Proud2bHumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bourbonroom.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-3562</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Re: Comment by Tim_CA&lt;/strong&gt;

Oooooooohhh, timmeh...lol...name calling, my favorite game :) . Since your comments contained no substantive logic, let&#039;s just get to the good part:

I&#039;ll take your &lt;em&gt;&quot;pseudo-intellectual dolt blowing nothing nothing but hot air&quot;&lt;/em&gt; and raise you a pseudonymous dork blowing his own &#039;horn&#039;, haha (good luck figuring that out).

&lt;em&gt;Gee can’t argue that, the man actually has a platform that is substanative (despite its flaws) rather than blowing empty rhetoric like your dim-bulb messiah.&lt;/em&gt;
I can&#039;t really argue against his &#039;substanative&#039; platform since substanative is not a word and the spell checker on this site clearly points that out (W, is that you slummin&#039; with us prols?)...but I notice that you frequently use &#039;blowing&#039; (typical contard subconscious fixation projection, perhaps?)...anyway, I&#039;ll raise you your &#039;dim-bulb&#039; messiah with a translucently pale senile ancient crash-test dummie.

&lt;em&gt;More America-hating liberal tripe. &lt;/em&gt;
That&#039;s funny, coming from a retarded chest-thumping, plutocrat&#039;s fascist dupe tool chitlin eater. Haha, this is fun :) .

Wow!!…You sure do hate this great Nation and the above average lifestyle it has afforded all of us!!…so now the military is enslaving people? Exactly who? And last time I checked, no one’s forcing you to drive a “Hummer” or any car for that matter.

&lt;em&gt;Really my uninfomed little friend???? &lt;/em&gt;
Yes, really, my ignorant tiny virtual acquaintance. I hope this answers your question to your satisfaction, since you were obviously veeery curious, judging by your enthusiastic use of the &#039;?&#039;.

&lt;em&gt;you think this country is un-evoving??&lt;/em&gt;
Once again, observe (much?) the auto-spellchecker... 

&lt;em&gt;60 years ago, your ilk would have been branded communist by McCarthy and his Cronies&lt;/em&gt;
Yes, we&#039;ve come a long way...now I get called &#039;ilk&#039; and &#039;fringe lib&#039; by his similarly intellectually challenged descendants...haha.

&lt;em&gt;This country is evolving continuously moron!&lt;/em&gt;
Well, your family tree certainly seems to be going in that direction, retard...lol.

&quot;Last word, freak.&quot; - Melvin Udall

&quot;Hittin&#039; the road, Jack, and I ain&#039;t comin&#039; back no more no more no more no more...&quot;

out

;-}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re: Comment by Tim_CA</strong></p>
<p>Oooooooohhh, timmeh&#8230;lol&#8230;name calling, my favorite game <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . Since your comments contained no substantive logic, let&#8217;s just get to the good part:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take your <em>&#8220;pseudo-intellectual dolt blowing nothing nothing but hot air&#8221;</em> and raise you a pseudonymous dork blowing his own &#8216;horn&#8217;, haha (good luck figuring that out).</p>
<p><em>Gee can’t argue that, the man actually has a platform that is substanative (despite its flaws) rather than blowing empty rhetoric like your dim-bulb messiah.</em><br />
I can&#8217;t really argue against his &#8217;substanative&#8217; platform since substanative is not a word and the spell checker on this site clearly points that out (W, is that you slummin&#8217; with us prols?)&#8230;but I notice that you frequently use &#8216;blowing&#8217; (typical contard subconscious fixation projection, perhaps?)&#8230;anyway, I&#8217;ll raise you your &#8216;dim-bulb&#8217; messiah with a translucently pale senile ancient crash-test dummie.</p>
<p><em>More America-hating liberal tripe. </em><br />
That&#8217;s funny, coming from a retarded chest-thumping, plutocrat&#8217;s fascist dupe tool chitlin eater. Haha, this is fun <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>Wow!!…You sure do hate this great Nation and the above average lifestyle it has afforded all of us!!…so now the military is enslaving people? Exactly who? And last time I checked, no one’s forcing you to drive a “Hummer” or any car for that matter.</p>
<p><em>Really my uninfomed little friend???? </em><br />
Yes, really, my ignorant tiny virtual acquaintance. I hope this answers your question to your satisfaction, since you were obviously veeery curious, judging by your enthusiastic use of the &#8216;?&#8217;.</p>
<p><em>you think this country is un-evoving??</em><br />
Once again, observe (much?) the auto-spellchecker&#8230; </p>
<p><em>60 years ago, your ilk would have been branded communist by McCarthy and his Cronies</em><br />
Yes, we&#8217;ve come a long way&#8230;now I get called &#8216;ilk&#8217; and &#8216;fringe lib&#8217; by his similarly intellectually challenged descendants&#8230;haha.</p>
<p><em>This country is evolving continuously moron!</em><br />
Well, your family tree certainly seems to be going in that direction, retard&#8230;lol.</p>
<p>&#8220;Last word, freak.&#8221; &#8211; Melvin Udall</p>
<p>&#8220;Hittin&#8217; the road, Jack, and I ain&#8217;t comin&#8217; back no more no more no more no more&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>out</p>
<p>;-}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
